• Tuesday

    US NAVY READY FOR CYBER WARFARE


    The U.S. Fleet Cyber Command, part of
    the U.S. 10th Fleet, is developing a strategy
    for modernizing its cyberoperations and
    transforming the Navy's network into a
    cyberwarfare platform, C4ISRNetworks
    reported earlier this month.

    The strategy will seek to advance five key
    goals:
    Operating the Navy network as a
    warfighting platform;
    Conducting tailored signals
    intelligence (SIGINT);
    Conducting offensive operations in
    cyberspace;
    Expanding cybersituational
    awareness; and
    Launching Navy cyberforces --
    essentially teams of cyberexperts who
    will conduct cyberwarfare. The Navy
    has 40 teams under development.
    The need for a stronger cybersecurity
    approach has been underlined by the
    penetration of U.S. government networks
    by hackers, the most recent of which was
    an attack on unsecured White House
    computers, which the U.S. government has
    blamed on Russia.
    "I do not think cyberwarfare ... is the best
    option," said Richard Blech, CEO and
    cofounder of Secure Channels.
    It's better to remove the reason for attacks
    by making the data unusable, he told
    TechNewsWorld.
    "Why would a hacker expend time and
    resources and risk arrest for data that will
    be unusable if the hack is successful?"
    Blech asked.
    What the Navy Plans
    Operating the Navy network as a
    warfighting platform requires command-
    and-control across all networks, on shore
    and at sea, and across different technical
    environments, Fleet Cyber Command CIO
    Kevin Cooley said.
    That would require balancing cost savings
    against defense, influencing the
    programming, budgeting and acquisition
    process.
    If the Navy were able to keep a tight hand
    on the purse strings, then could it actually
    develop the kind of defensive capabilities
    needed, especially in a warfighting
    context?
    "Take out the word 'warfighting,' and this
    is the same dilemma that every
    organization faces today," observed John
    Gunn, vice president, corporate
    communications, at Vasco Data Security.
    Expanding cybersituational awareness will
    require cooperation with the private sector,
    which can offer visualization and analytics
    technology as well as experience, systems
    and data strategies, Cooley pointed out.
    Private companies likely would be part of
    the DoD's Defense Industrial Base , first
    piloted in 2011.
    How much defense contractors actually
    can contribute is questionable. The
    AntiSec hackers' movement in 2011 broke
    into Booz Allen Hamilton's servers, and
    stole and published 90,000 military
    usernames from its servers. It also stole
    and published 1 GB of private emails and
    documents of Vanguard Defense Industries
    senior vice president Richard Garcia.
    "Even Mike Tyson got knocked out," noted
    Vasco's Gunn.
    However, "he was still ... nobody you
    wanted to be on the wrong side of," he told
    TechNewsWorld.
    Crime and Punishment
    The notion of cyberwar may not be a bad
    thing, as not responding to hacks on
    government systems makes the U.S. look
    weak.
    The Defense Department has been working
    on the idea of retaliation for hacks for
    some years. Then-deputy secretary of
    defense William Lynn in 2011 gave a
    speech outlining the DoD's strategy for
    operating in cyberspace.
    The DoD's approach consists of five
    strategic initiatives developed as part of
    the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity
    Initiative .
    Among other things, the CNCI considers
    cyberspace an operational domain in land,
    sea, air and space.
    In line with this, U.S. defense officials
    previously have floated the idea of
    launching targeted physical attacks in
    retaliation for cyberattacks on computer
    systems and networks.
    "Cyberwarfare can be an effective deterrent
    in two ways," Gunn suggested. "It can
    make our assets less attractive for fear of
    retaliation -- and used in a preemptive
    manner, it could potentially be used to
    interrupt or detect hacker threats in
    process to decrease their effectiveness."
    It's difficult to fully rely on a network after
    it's been compromised.
    "Once an attacker gets into your systems,
    it can be difficult to get them out," Tripwire
    CTO Dwayne Melancon told
    TechNewsWorld, "particularly when your
    network and internal security controls
    allow the attacker to move around on your
    network without being noticed."